.png)
.jpg)
If you’ve ever scaled catalog ads using a product feed, you already know the workflow isn’t the hard part. The hard part is control.
You can plug in a feed, apply a template, and push dozens of creatives live in a few clicks. But what if you only want to feature high-margin items? Or AOV above $100? Or suppress low-stock SKUs? What if you want to know which templates are actually driving performance—not just pushing impressions?
That’s where platforms like Marpipe and Feedr come into play. Both offer catalog ad automation. Both claim to make production easier. But only one is built to help you test, learn, and improve over time.
Feedr focuses on production speed and simplicity. It’s built to get ads out the door fast. Marpipe, on the other hand, is built for teams that care about outcomes. It brings testing, segmentation, and performance data into every step of the creative process—so you’re not just moving fast, you’re moving smart.
This comparison breaks down the key differences between Marpipe and Feedr: where they overlap, where they diverge, and why performance marketers are increasingly choosing Marpipe to drive results at scale.
Feedr is a lightweight creative automation tool that helps marketers spin up catalog-style ads from product feeds. You connect your feed, choose a template, and Feedr auto-generates image-based creatives across Meta, Google, and other channels. It’s positioned as a production shortcut for eCommerce teams: no designers required, no asset handoffs, no waiting around.
But what you gain in speed, you lose in flexibility. Feedr doesn’t offer testing infrastructure, product-level insights, or advanced optimization tools. You can produce more creative, but there’s no way to tell what’s working or why.
For brands with small catalogs or teams that just need to ship basic feed-based ads, Feedr gets the job done. But if you care about performance, or want to scale what works, Feedr hits a ceiling fast.
Marpipe is a creative performance platform built for marketers who want more than just automation, they want results.
At its core, Marpipe helps teams create, test, and scale catalog ads that actually perform. It connects directly to your product feed, allowing you to generate hundreds (or thousands) of variations in minutes, but unlike traditional feed-based tools, it doesn’t stop at production. It brings testing, segmentation, and optimization into the same workflow, so you’re not just making more creative, you’re making smarter creative every time you launch.
Here’s what you get with Marpipe:
Create on-brand, high-converting templates that automatically pull in product attributes like title, price, and image, so every SKU looks polished and consistent. Whether you’re running Meta Advantage+ or seasonal TikTok drops, the design system is flexible enough to match your brand and responsive enough to update with your feed.
Turn static product cards into motion-optimized video ads that stop the scroll. Marpipe lets you build short-form video templates that scale across your entire catalog without the manual lift, giving you creative that performs better on platforms like Meta and TikTok.
Marpipe’s AI tools turn your product data into real marketing copy—automatically generating headlines, descriptions, and creative variants at scale. You can iterate faster without sacrificing quality, and keep your tone consistent across hundreds of assets.
Marpipe lets you filter your feed based on real business metrics, like average order value, ROAS, margin, or SKU performance, and create targeted creative for each segment. Want to push best sellers or feature low-stock items? It takes seconds.
It’s not just a feed tool. It’s a system for creative performance. Instead of guessing which combinations will work, Marpipe helps you design them, test them, and scale the ones that drive revenue.
Feedr is designed to make catalog ad production easier. And it does. But when you're running high-volume campaigns and need creative that actually converts, not just ships, Feedr’s simplicity becomes a limitation.
Marpipe picks up where Feedr leaves off. It doesn’t just automate creative, it gives you the tools to optimize it, test it, and scale the best-performing assets, based on what your audience actually responds to.
Here’s where the difference becomes clear:
With Feedr, the creative process ends when the ad goes live. There’s no testing framework. No ability to experiment with headlines, layouts, or product sets. No visibility into what’s working.
Marpipe was built to test. Brands like Taylor Stitch used Marpipe to dramatically increase their creative output, scaling up 10x the number of ad variations tested, and saw a 30% year-over-year growth in return, surpassing their goal by 50%. Their strategy focused on modular creative, using Marpipe’s testing infrastructure to isolate and optimize variables across their ads. That level of performance insight simply isn’t possible with Feedr’s static setup.
As outlined in Marpipe’s guide to why creative testing drives better results, testing really is how growth teams win.
Feedr treats your entire product catalog the same. Every SKU gets equal treatment, regardless of whether it converts, or whether it’s even in stock. That makes targeting feel like guesswork, and performance unpredictable.
Marpipe, by contrast, lets you segment and filter your catalog based on metrics like AOV, margin, category, or inventory levels. You can create ad sets that focus only on your highest-impact products, and suppress anything that’s not ready to scale.
This is how Simple Modern unlocked a 52% ROAS increase and cut CPA by 28%. By using Marpipe’s product optimization tools, they were able to highlight top-performing SKUs, build more relevant creative, and avoid wasted spend across campaigns.
Feedr is built for speed, but its templated output lacks flexibility. You get static images with basic layouts and limited creative control. And without video or advanced motion, your ads risk blending in rather than standing out.
Marpipe brings speed and substance. Its generative AI tools and motion-optimized templates allow you to scale high-quality creative without the heavy production lift. Brands like NULASTIN doubled their tested creative volume and reduced CPA by 34% while spending 53% less time on production—all by using Marpipe’s tools to streamline their modular video testing.
If you’re running paid campaigns on Meta or TikTok, motion matters. As explored in Marpipe’s blog on why catalog ads are so effective, video assets consistently outperform static creative, especially in high-scroll environments.
With Feedr, creative lives in isolation. You launch the ad, but you don’t know which product variations, messages, or visuals are driving results.
Marpipe changes that by making performance part of the creative process. Every asset you build is tied to measurable results, so you can identify what’s working and scale with intention.
That’s exactly what Simple Modern did. After hitting a performance ceiling with static catalog ads, they used Marpipe to test new design treatments across their product feed. By tying creative variables directly to ROAS and CPA, they identified high-impact design decisions, like how product titles and branding were displayed, and scaled the ones that delivered. The result: a 52% increase in return on ad spend and a 28% decrease in customer acquisition costs.
With Marpipe, creative isn’t just output. It’s a lever for growth that is measurable, repeatable, and aligned with the rest of your media strategy.
Feedr is a solid entry point for brands that need basic automation and don’t have the team or time to manage complexity. If your catalog is small, you’re not running creative tests, and your main priority is getting product ads live quickly, Feedr can save time and reduce your reliance on design resources.
It’s particularly useful for smaller teams without a dedicated performance function—brands who want a plug-and-play solution to fill ad placements, not optimize them. For those use cases, Feedr’s simplicity is a strength.
But if you're spending more on paid media, managing campaigns across platforms, or starting to ask, “Which of these ads is actually working?,” Feedr will start to feel limiting fast.
Marpipe is designed for growth-minded teams who see creative as more than just a production task. If your business runs high-volume campaigns, wants to iterate quickly, or needs to prioritize certain SKUs based on AOV, ROAS, or seasonality, Marpipe gives you the tools to do it intelligently. It’s not just a platform to generate catalog ads. It’s a system to test them, track performance, and scale what works.
Marpipe is the better choice if:
It’s a fit for growth-stage DTC brands, performance marketing teams, agencies managing dynamic product campaigns, and any business looking to make creative a measurable part of its media strategy.
Most teams focus their energy on media strategy i.e. audience, budget, bids, etc. and treat creative like a checkbox. But the brands growing fastest today are the ones treating creative like a lever.
Marpipe gives you the tools to make that shift. Not just to generate more ads, but to understand what’s driving performance, and scale it with confidence.
If you’re ready to stop guessing and start building creative that performs, you can get started for free or book a demo to see how Marpipe fits into your workflow.
