.png)
.png)
Performance marketers have more tools at their disposal than ever before, but not every tool evolves at the same pace as the channels it serves. ROI Hunter has long been a recognizable name in performance marketing, particularly for brands that want to enrich their product feeds and visualize performance data. Yet the ecommerce landscape in 2025 looks very different from when ROI Hunter first entered the scene. Catalog ads are now the centerpiece of paid acquisition, especially with the rise of AI-driven product discovery.
This shift has left many marketers wondering whether ROI Hunter is still the right fit. As campaigns increasingly depend on creative automation, feed optimization, and discoverability across Shopify, Meta, TikTok, and Google Shopping, teams are actively looking for ROI Hunter alternatives. That search often leads them to Marpipe—a platform built for the next generation of catalog advertising.
ROI Hunter emerged as a performance marketing platform that bridged product feeds and reporting. Its positioning centered around data connections, giving marketers the ability to integrate product information, enrich feeds with custom attributes, and connect those feeds into campaigns across major ad platforms. For brands with complex data pipelines, this was a meaningful step forward.
ROI Hunter’s value proposition has traditionally been strongest in:
For enterprises with heavy internal resources, ROI Hunter offered a way to visualize performance and apply advanced data rules to their feeds. But while it solved some data problems, it did not directly solve the creative and campaign execution challenges that dominate today’s performance marketing playbook.
The tipping point for most brands is not whether ROI Hunter can enrich a feed, it can, but whether the platform helps them translate that data into actual campaign results. The landscape has shifted, and today’s performance marketers need more than dashboards. They need automation that ties data to creative execution and helps scale catalog campaigns without manual lift.
Marketers who adopt ROI Hunter rarely complain about the data itself. The platform delivers enriched views and dashboards that allow teams to splice and segment performance in sophisticated ways. The challenge is what happens next. Having an ocean of data doesn’t automatically generate growth. Without modern creative automation layered on top, those insights remain stranded. We know static feed enrichment and spreadsheets no longer cut it. Brands need catalog video, dynamic templates, and creative flexibility tied directly to their feeds so every SKU can be turned into a compelling ad unit. Without that bridge, ROI Hunter’s data advantage feels incomplete.
Another recurring friction point is the onboarding process. Unlocking ROI Hunter’s full potential is rarely a plug-and-play experience. It often requires multiple training sessions, dedicated onboarding support, and internal analysts who know how to manipulate and interpret the system. For leaner marketing teams, this creates a significant barrier. Instead of gaining speed, they find themselves slowed by setup, internal dependencies, and the steep learning curve. At a time when marketing agility is one of the biggest competitive advantages, platforms that feel heavy quickly lose their appeal.
Pricing also plays a decisive role. ROI Hunter firmly positions itself in the enterprise tier, which means mid-market and fast-growing DTC brands are often priced out before they even begin. Even for larger organizations, the cost is difficult to justify without clear creative outputs tied directly to campaign performance. By contrast, alternatives that deliver both data and action at a more accessible price point have become far more attractive to modern teams that need to show ROI quickly.
Adaptability has also emerged as a dealbreaker. ROI Hunter integrates with Meta and Google, which covered most needs five years ago. But in 2025, the marketing ecosystem is more fragmented and fast-moving. TikTok Shop has become a major growth driver, AI-powered search is rewriting the rules of discoverability, and catalog ads now span multiple touchpoints beyond just retargeting. ROI Hunter’s original design hasn’t kept pace with this shift. Marketers increasingly find themselves bolting on other tools or building custom workarounds to cover the gaps, which is exactly the kind of operational drag they hoped to avoid.
To understand how these two platforms differ, it’s useful to look at them head-to-head across the areas marketers care about most.
ROI Hunter often demands technical onboarding and specialized expertise. It works well for enterprise teams with analysts, but smaller teams can find the platform overwhelming. Marpipe takes the opposite approach: it’s lightweight, marketer-first, and designed for fast adoption without technical hurdles.
ROI Hunter’s creative features are limited to feed enrichment. While that adds data attributes, it doesn’t create new ad experiences. Marpipe, by contrast, builds catalog video, dynamic templates, and AI-driven creative directly from feeds, ensuring every product gets its own high-quality creative treatment.
ROI Hunter offers data visibility, but acting on those insights can still require manual effort. Marpipe integrates optimization directly into the workflow—automatically filtering underperformers and scaling top products in real time. This translates data into action without extra steps.
ROI Hunter scales best with very large enterprises that have the resources to invest in data analysts and longer onboarding. Marpipe scales across the mid-market and enterprise spectrum, providing tools that are powerful enough for large teams but simple enough for leaner marketing departments.
ROI Hunter’s enterprise pricing model creates barriers for many ecommerce brands. Marpipe’s flexible approach makes advanced catalog automation accessible without locking teams into enterprise-only tiers.
Marpipe was created with a different philosophy: instead of starting with reporting dashboards, it starts with the product feed itself and builds automation around creative, performance, and optimization. The platform treats catalog ads as the front line of customer acquisition rather than a back-office utility.
At its core, Marpipe focuses on three areas that define modern ecommerce growth:
Creative Automation: Marpipe makes it possible to generate image and video ads directly from your product feed. Generative AI powers dynamic templates, product-level video, and creative personalization at scale. This bridges the gap between feed data and customer-facing ads, ensuring every SKU can be represented in engaging, platform-native creative.
Feed-Native Optimization: Instead of treating feeds as static spreadsheets, Marpipe ties them directly to performance. Its optimization tools automatically filter out low-performing products, highlight best sellers, and reallocate spend toward high-value SKUs. This turns the feed into a performance engine, not just a data source.
Accessibility and Scale: Marpipe is designed for marketers, not engineers. It doesn’t require months of training or enterprise-only onboarding. Teams can log in and immediately start producing ads, making it as useful for mid-sized brands as it is for large enterprises.
Where ROI Hunter paved the way for data-driven feeds, Marpipe represents the next step: uniting feeds with creative and automation in a way that directly drives performance.
While Marpipe is the leading ROI Hunter alternative, it’s not the only option brands explore. Depending on needs and resources, other platforms occasionally enter the conversation.
Smartly has built a strong reputation in enterprise creative automation, but the platform is locked behind long contracts and complex onboarding. Even their sales process often requires multiple meetings with engineers just to see a demo. For Fortune 500 advertisers, Smartly can deliver. For leaner teams, it’s often too heavy. See our deep dive into Smartly Review and Alternatives.
Socioh positions itself as a Shopify-friendly plugin for catalog ads. It’s often the first platform smaller brands try when launching dynamic product ads. But as brands grow, they run into limits: restricted creative flexibility, rising costs, and a lack of feed optimization tools for scale. Check out our Socioh Review and Alternatives.
Hunch Ads is another creative automation platform with solid capabilities for dynamic templates. Where it falls short is in integrated feed management and optimization. Without performance-tied feed tools, brands may find themselves layering additional platforms on top. Learn more about Hunch Ads in our review and alternatives blog.
Abyssale emphasizes template-driven creative automation, particularly in banners and static formats. While useful for quick design generation, it doesn’t have the same performance-driven catalog focus that modern ecommerce teams require. See more in Abyssale Review and Alternatives.
Confect.io is popular for visually polished catalog ads. It excels at design customization, but its performance optimization features are lighter than what Marpipe delivers. For brands that need to tie design directly to feed-level results, Confect can feel incomplete. Want to learn more? Read our Confect Review and Alternatives blog.
Each of these ROI Hunter alternatives has its place. But for brands that want feed-native creative, optimization, and scalability in one platform, Marpipe consistently becomes the choice.
It’s easy to get lost in platform comparisons, but the real story is how catalog ads themselves have evolved. Five years ago, they were treated as a retargeting tool. They were a way to capture users who had already visited your site. Today, catalog ads are the primary driver of paid conversions across Meta, TikTok, and Google Shopping.
This transformation is tied to the rise of AI-driven discovery. When a customer asks a conversational search engine to “show fall sweaters under $150,” the engine doesn’t invent results. It queries structured product feeds. That means your brand’s visibility depends directly on whether your feed is optimized, structured, and paired with creative that stands out in those high-intent moments.
ROI Hunter helped marketers enrich feeds and see performance data. Marpipe pushes the industry forward by turning feeds into creative engines that can thrive in AI-powered discovery environments.
Choosing between ROI Hunter and its alternatives is ultimately about deciding what kind of growth engine your team needs. ROI Hunter built its reputation by enriching product feeds and surfacing data, but in 2025, that’s only half the battle. Brands don’t just need to see performance; they need platforms that turn product feed management into an active driver of campaign results.
That’s where Marpipe stands apart. Instead of treating the feed as a static spreadsheet, Marpipe transforms it into a creative and optimization engine. Catalog ads aren’t an afterthought, they’re the foundation for discoverability across Meta, TikTok, and Google Shopping. With Marpipe, product feed management powers everything from catalog ad creative and generative video to automated filtering and spend allocation. The result is a direct line between your product data and ads that actually perform.
If your team is evaluating ROI Hunter alternatives, the real question is whether you want more dashboards or more action. ROI Hunter will continue to serve brands that prioritize reporting. But for marketers who need their product feeds to work harder, fueling creative at scale and optimizing performance automatically, Marpipe is the platform built for the future of catalog advertising.
Ready to see how Marpipe can transform your product feed into a growth engine? Get started today and start turning your catalog into high-performing ads.
